Caroline Schuster

Australian National University

Theory as Reproduction: Histories of Doing Feminist Anthropology in Australia

The relationship between feminism and anthropology has never been straightforward. The launch in 2020 of Feminist Anthropology, the journal of the Association for Feminist Anthropology section at the American Anthropological Association, may be one indicator of the consolidation of the field. However, only a few decades earlier, significant political, institutional, and intellectual struggles were waged to make this possible. A relationship between feminism and anthropology was not a natural alliance but was forged through contested debates such as those over the universality of women’s oppression (Ortner 1972), the incompatibility of a relativism and feminism (Strathern 1988), and through the “sex wars” in the United States (Rubin 2011). Feminist anthropologists have also pioneered new possibilities for representation in the ethnographic genre (Visweswaran 1994). In this moment of intensifying attacks on feminist thought globally, on women’s and trans people’s reproductive rights and in universities, it is crucial for anthropology to reflect on feminist histories of the discipline and what they can tell us about reproducing knowledge in the present moment.[1]This collection entered production in early 2025, during the period between the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States in 2024, his inauguration for a second term, and subsequent steps taken by his administration to restrict women’s and trans people’s rights in profoundly troubling ways. The many ways that the women in our roundtable struggled against misogynistic academic institutions, and their ability to link intersectional feminist political struggles to their work in the classroom, may offer inspiration in dark times (see also hooks 1994).

Continue reading

Notes

Notes
1 This collection entered production in early 2025, during the period between the election of Donald Trump as president of the United States in 2024, his inauguration for a second term, and subsequent steps taken by his administration to restrict women’s and trans people’s rights in profoundly troubling ways. The many ways that the women in our roundtable struggled against misogynistic academic institutions, and their ability to link intersectional feminist political struggles to their work in the classroom, may offer inspiration in dark times (see also hooks 1994).

Special Focus: Feminist Anthropology in Australia

HAR editors are pleased to bring you this Special Focus Section, guest edited by Benjamin Heagarty, Shiori Shakuto, and Caroline Schuster. The pieces in this collection will be published on a rolling basis, and the table of contents will be updated accordingly.

This special section brings together seven essays which were originally presented at the roundtable Theory as Reproduction: Reflections on the History of Doing Feminist Anthropology in Australia. It also includes an introduction, co-authored by Benjamin Hegarty, Shiori Shakuto, and Caroline Schuster. The event was held at the annual Australian Anthropological Society conference held on the lands of the Ngunnawal and Ngambri people (Australian National University, Canberra) on Monday 2 December 2019. Part oral history and part conversation, the organizers brought together a group of women to reflect on their experiences of a politically and intellectually dynamic period in Australian feminist anthropology during the 1970s and 1980s. For this roundtable, held at the campus where Derek Freeman penned his famous series of polemics denouncing Margaret Mead’s research, feminist researchers came together to reflect on the work of producing theory and the labour involved in its reproduction through the maternal line.

Table of Contents

May 2025

Theory as Reproduction: Histories of Doing Feminist Anthropology in Australia

Benjamin Hegarty, Shiori Shakuto, and Caroline Schuster

The “F” Word: Anthropology, Positionality, and Intersecting Lives in Oz

Margaret Jolly