Linda Andersson Burnet

Uppsala University

Traces of Multivocal Botany: Lars Montin’s Travels in Sápmi in 1749 and the Case of Angelica archangelica

On the 15th and 16th of July 1749 the small village Kvikkjokk (Huhttán in Lule Sápmi) in northern Sweden became the scene of a heated debate on epistemology and botany between a Linnaean field naturalist, local clergy and Indigenous Sámi people. At the forefront were local botanical names and uses of Angelica archangelica, also known simply as the angelica, wild celery, or Norwegian angelica (or “kvanne” in Swedish). Sámi people, temporarily present at the location in order to attend two compulsory church gatherings were called in not once but twice to settle issues relating to nomenclature and identity. The first time they responded, they sided with the travelling naturalist Lars Montin (1723-1785), and, by extension, his teacher Linnaeus’s descriptions published in Flora Lapponica (1737).[1]Lars Montin, ’Beskrifning öfver en resa, på Kongl: Wetenskaps Societetens uti Uppsala, men i synnerhet Wälb. Herr Arch. Linnæi anmodan år 1749 om sommaren förrättad til Lapska Fiællarne Åfvan Luleå Stad’, MSS BANKS COLL MON, Botanical Collections, The Natural History Museum, London, 416, see also below discussion of the Angelica archangelica The second time, they dismissed the information detailed by Linnaeus in the same flora. Nor did they agree with the views of the local vicar Olof Olofsson Modéen (1696-1754), who translated the exchanges for Montin, that the plant in question was lethally poisonous.[2]Montin, ’Beskrifning öfver en resa’, 421–422. The plant in question here was Angelica sylvestri, which Modéen seems to have confused with Hyoscyamus niger.   

Continue reading

Notes

Notes
1 Lars Montin, ’Beskrifning öfver en resa, på Kongl: Wetenskaps Societetens uti Uppsala, men i synnerhet Wälb. Herr Arch. Linnæi anmodan år 1749 om sommaren förrättad til Lapska Fiællarne Åfvan Luleå Stad’, MSS BANKS COLL MON, Botanical Collections, The Natural History Museum, London, 416, see also below discussion of the Angelica archangelica
2 Montin, ’Beskrifning öfver en resa’, 421–422. The plant in question here was Angelica sylvestri, which Modéen seems to have confused with Hyoscyamus niger.

Special Focus: Histories of Ethnoscience

HAR editors are pleased to bring you this Special Focus Section, guest edited by Raphael Uchôa, Staffan Müller-Wille and Harriet Mercer. The pieces in this collection will be published on a rolling basis, and the table of contents will be updated accordingly.

In the middle of the twentieth century, a flurry of scientific sub-disciplines emerged. These went by the name of ethno-sciences and they came in numerous varieties from ethno-medicine to ethno-botany, -zoology, -biology, -medicine, -pharmacology, -astronomy, -psychology, -cartography, and more. The creation of these sub-disciplines was not, however, a strictly twentieth-century phenomenon. The development of “ethno-science” as an epistemic category that, in one way or another, involves other knowledges than science has a much longer and uneven history. This Special Focus Section aims to provide a critical historical account of the emergence of the “ethno-sciences,” largely focusing on the plant sciences as a paradigmatic example. In particular, it focuses on the ruptures and continuities that occurred from the late eighteenth through to the twentieth centuries, when Western scientists’ attitudes to the category of “Indigenous knowledge” were subject to change across space and time.

Table of Contents

March 2024

Science and Its Others: Histories of Ethnoscience

Raphael Uchôa, Staffan Müller-Wille and Harriet Mercer

Between the Ethnographic Record and the Field Diary: The Hybrid Medical Practices in Zinacantán before Ethnomedicine (Mexico, 1940s)

Paula López Caballero

April 2024

Sources for the History of Ethnosciences: James Mooney and the Sacred Formulas of the Cherokees

Raphael Uchôa and Silvia Waisse

May 2024

Plant Identification and Ethnoscience in the Work of Rumphius

Roy Ellen

August 2024

“Women in Traditional Agricultural Knowledge”: Mexican Ethnobotany in the 1970s

Diana Sclavo

The Absence of Brazilian Medicinal Plants in Portuguese Writings

Marcia H. M. Ferraz and Ana Maria Alfonso-Goldfarb

October 2024

The Beyond-Intellectual-Property Moment in Context

Graham Dutfield

November 2024

Globalizing plant knowledge beyond bioprospecting?

Sabina Leonelli

December 2024

“México es un país megadiverso”: Biocultural Heritage and Exceptionality in Mexican Ethnobiology

Abigail Nieves Delgado

February 2025

Traces of Multivocal Botany: Lars Montin’s Travels in Sápmi in 1749 and the Case of Angelica archangelica

Linda Andersson Burnet and Hanna Hodacs